Welcome

New Business

Latest FAW Report

Updated Jan 30, 2026

Current status: Fall armyworm has been detected across multiple regions of the North Island. Most detections remain at low population levels. An exception is Northland, particularly the Far North, where high populations are present. In some crops, infestations have reached up to 50 per cent, requiring insecticide applications. Current modelling indicates that a third generation is likely towards the end of February. This is expected to be followed closely by a short window where control is most effective, when newly emerged larvae are small and exposed on leaves, silks, and tassels. Resistance management is critical. Growers and advisers should refer to the Sparta label and to the resistance management section of this website for guidance.

In the South Island, fall armyworm is now widespread in the Tasman and Westland regions. Infestation levels are similar to those observed in early 2023. Due to poor spring planting conditions, very late-planted crops remain at risk and should be scouted as frequently as possible to ensure economic thresholds are identified in time to act. Delayed planting increases the likelihood of overlap with later generations and higher pressure.

Alongside Fall armyworm, high populations of Helicoverpa armigera are again being observed this season. Scouting should focus on silks, with attention given to eggs and newly hatched larvae before they move into the protected areas at the top of the cob, where control becomes more difficult.

In Northland, beneficial parasitoids are playing a clear role. Cotesia is widespread, and early laboratory rearing of collected larvae indicates parasitism rates from 30 to 40 per cent. Recent field observations by Dr Graham Walker from BSI support this, with adult Cotesia described as being as common as “flies in the outback of Australia” in maize crops across the region. These observations reinforce the importance of careful scouting and considered intervention to avoid unnecessary disruption of beneficial insects.

Communication: Collaboration and information sharing among growers, agronomists, and industry experts remain essential to refining management strategies and improving outcomes.  Your observations are important. Please report any FAW to ashley.mills@FAR.org.nz.

Regional Updates

Northland

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • Large infestations of new second generation FAW are requiring chemical applications in the Far North. Elsewhere populations appear to be much smaller and localised in maize crops.

Auckland and Waikato

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • FAW is widespread in small populations. Walk your crops and identify larvae when they are small and easily identified by "window pane" type damage.

Bay of Plenty

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • FAW is present in some maize and sweetcorn paddocks. Walk your crops and identify larvae when they are small and easily identified by "window pane" type damage.

Gisborne

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • FAW reports have been received of low-level infestations, some male moths have also been caught in pheromone traps. Walk your crops and consult your advisor if you have concerns.

Westland

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • The first generation is widespread from Hokitika north, populations observed have not exceeded 5% in crops however there are a number of late planted paddocks which could be at increased risk. Walk your crops and identify larvae when they are small and easily identified by "window pane" type damage.

Tasman

Updated Jan 16, 2026
  • Small populations of FAW have been observed in multiple maize paddocks.  Walk your crops and identify larvae, consult with your advisor if you have any concerns.

Taranaki and Manawatu-Whanganui

Updated Nov 21, 2025
  • A small number of suspected male FAW moths have been caught in pheramone traps in the region.  Scouting crops should be factored in as often as possible to identify any larvae in paddocks.

Canterbury

Updated Oct 29, 2025
  • No recent FAW observations.  The first maize crops are emerging; scouting should be factored in whenever possible. Plan ahead, avoid late-planted crops, and consult your advisor if you have concerns for the upcoming season.

Hawke's Bay

Updated Oct 29, 2025
  • No recent FAW observations.  The first maize crops are emerging; scouting should be factored in whenever possible. Plan ahead, avoid late-planted crops, and consult your advisor if you have concerns for the upcoming season.

Is it Fall armyworm?

There are three key characteristics used in combination that will help identify FAW.

  • First, a distinct ‘Y’ on the head leading into the dorsal line.
  • Second, four trapezoid patterned dots on the body segments.
  • Finally, four pronounced dots in a square pattern at the rear.   

Other pests may share a similar identification but not all three key markings together.

 

Photo courtesy Bioeconomy Science Institute (PFR) 

Fall armyworm lifecycle and damage

Should I be monitoring my crop?

Crop monitoring is vital for managing pests in maize and sweetcorn effectively. Regular monitoring starts as soon as crops are planted.  The most effective crop monitoring tool is crop scouting, which is defined as 'careful continuous observation', where a crop scout walks the whole crop to assess infestations and fresh damage. Crop scouting helps detect pest presence early, preventing significant damage during the vulnerable establishment stage of crops. It enables growers to assess pest populations, identify affected areas, and determine the most effective and timely control measures. Monitoring also supports integrated pest management (IPM) by providing insights into the activity of natural enemies, like Cotesia ruficrus. This ensures that interventions, such as selective insecticides, are used only when necessary, reducing costs and minimising environmental impact.  It is also a great opportunity to assess crop status, nutrient requirements, other pests present, and disease and virus pressure, like Northern leaf blight.

How do I monitor my crop?

1. Identify the crop stage and plan the scouting choose a pattern (zig-zag or "W" shape) to cover all parts of the field.

2. Walk the field properly follow the planned path, and stop at regular points across the field.

3. Inspect the plants check several plants at each site for FAW signs:

  • Damage on leaves
  • Frass (insect droppings)
  • Larvae feeding in the whorl or on leaves
  • Identify and record the presence of other pest species.
  • Observe and record any beneficial species, especially Cotesia ruficrus.

4. Count and record

  • Record the total number of plants checked.
  • Record the number of plants with FAW damage or larvae.
  • Record the size of FAW larvae.
  • Record sightings of other pests or beneficial insects.

5. Calculate the percentage use the formula:

  • (Number of damaged plants ÷ Total plants checked) × 100
  • Example: (24÷150) ×100=16%

6. Compare to the threshold use the threshold table to decide if action is needed

7. Repeat scout crops as often as possible, ideally once a week at a minimum, following a different path each time.

Note: Checking more sites within a crop gives a far better picture of Fall Armyworm infestation than checking more plants per site. The key is spatial coverage—aim for around 50 sites (more for large paddocks, fewer for small ones)— or enough until you are confident you understand the infestation’s spread and severity

 

When plants are small and it is easy to move through the crop, we recommend a "W" shape scouting pattern.

 

 

When plants reach the later whorl stage, it can become harder to move through the crop.  We recommend a zig-zag-shaped scouting pattern, allowing quicker and more effective coverage of the field.

Monitoring for adult FAW moths

Why does the size of the caterpillar matter?

Identifying the size of Fall armyworm (FAW) larvae is important for effective targeted chemical intervention because smaller larvae are more vulnerable to insecticides. Early detection of young larvae, typically less than 10 mm in length, allows for more effective control before they burrow into the whorl or cob. As larvae grow larger, they become harder to kill, cause more damage, and may require higher chemical inputs, which increases cost and environmental impact. Accurate assessment of larval size ensures the timely and efficient application of control measures.

 

Source: Corteva Agriscience

Economic Thresholds

Economic thresholds are very important in an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy because they help make smart decisions about pest control. An economic threshold is the level of pest numbers or damage at which action must be taken to prevent the pest from causing too much damage and reducing the crop yield in a way that would cost more money than the cost of controlling the pest.

This is the current New Zealand economic thresholds guide developed by Bioeconomy Science Institute (AgR)

What are other similar pests in maize?

What are beneficials?

Let the good guys do the work!

A wide range of beneficial predators and parasitoids contributes to the natural control of Fall Armyworm (FAW) in arable cropping systems, including maize and sweetcorn. These natural enemies can be categorised into resident and transient species. Resident species live within the crop environment year-round, playing a crucial role in controlling pests during crop establishment when the plants are most vulnerable. Transient species, on the other hand, move into the crop only when a pest population is present and serve as an important part of pest suppression.

Predators

Predators, such as spiders, are among the most effective natural enemies of FAW. Spiders can be abundant in maize and sweetcorn systems, preying on a variety of FAW life stages, including eggs and larvae. These predators are relatively easy to spot due to their larger size and active hunting behaviour. Their impact is immediate as they capture and consume their prey directly and may contribute to a significant reduction in FAW populations.

Parasitoids

Parasitoids, such as the wasp Cotesia ruficrus, are less visible but very important in controlling FAW. Cotesia ruficrus lays its eggs inside FAW larvae, and the developing wasp larvae consume the host from within, eventually killing it. This activity often goes unnoticed until the later larvae or pupal stage when the parasitoid creates a bunch of cocoons within or near the remains of the host. These parasitoids can also be monitored by examining host larvae for signs of parasitism or identifying cocoons in the crop.

Integration with Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

IPM strategies aim to maximise the populations of resident beneficial species, such as spiders, while encouraging the activity of transient species like Cotesia ruficrus. With the reduction or withdrawal of broad-spectrum insecticides, it may take time for resident populations to recover and establish, but transient species can readily colonise a crop when FAW is present. Encouraging biodiversity, maintaining habitats, and using selective insecticides can help optimise the roles of these natural enemies in FAW management.

Plant & Food Research has identified Cotesia ruficrus and spiders as key natural enemies of FAW in New Zealand maize and sweetcorn crops. However, many other predators and parasitoids also contribute to the natural suppression of FAW populations, forming a diverse and dynamic system of biological control. This natural management method is a critical component of sustainable FAW control and reduces reliance on chemical insecticides.

Natural predators of FAW

Fall armyworm resistance management

Insecticide options

Products Last Reviewed Jan 30, 2026
120 g/L Jemvelva® active (Spinetoram)
Sparta™

Mode of Action: Jemvelva® active is active on all larval life stages and enters the insect primarily through the digestive system (ingestion activity) and secondarily through the insect exoskeleton (contact activity).

IRAC Group: 5

Beneficial Impact: Anecdotal evidence suggests this active ingredient is suspected to be harmful to small parasitic wasps

Spray Information
Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki
DiPel DF

Mode of Action: Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes

IRAC Group: 11

Beneficial Impact: Low Lepidopteran-specific microbial toxin that must be ingested.

Spray Information
Chlorpyriphos
Multiple generics

Mode of Action: Organophosphate. Has contact and vapour action and also acts as a stomach poison when ingested. Acts directly on the nervous system of susceptible pests.

IRAC Group: 1B

Beneficial Impact: High impact on all insects, very harmful to beneficials.

Spray Information
lambda-cyhalothrin
KARATE ZEON, CYHELLA, HALEX CS, LAVRON, TAEKWANDO 250 CS

Mode of Action: Synthetic pyrethroid. Primarily a contact and stomach poison with direct effects on the nervous system of susceptible insect pests.

IRAC Group: 3A

Beneficial Impact: Highly toxic to ALL beneficial insects

Spray Information
Tetraniliprole 480 g/L
Vayego Forte

Mode of Action: Group 28 compounds modulate insect ryanodine receptors (RyRs), which are calcium channels critical for muscle function. By binding to these receptors, they cause muscle paralysis and cessation of feeding, leading to insect death.

IRAC Group: 28

Beneficial Impact: Low impact on most beneficials, although effects on Cotesia ruficrus are currently unknown.

Spray Information
Chlorantraniliprole 200 g/L
Coragen®

Mode of Action: Group 28 compounds modulate insect ryanodine receptors (RyRs), which are calcium channels critical for muscle function. By binding to these receptors, they cause muscle paralysis and cessation of feeding, leading to insect death.

IRAC Group: 28

Beneficial Impact: Harmful to some beneficial insects – particularly some foliage-dwelling predators which may be used in Integrated Pest Management.

Spray Information