Welcome
You are viewing Stage One of an evolving resource designed to support Fall armyworm management in New Zealand. We welcome your feedback as we continue to build and improve this site.
New Business
Newly hatched FAW larvae, reared by Anne Barrington of Plant & Food Research. This research colony is vital to provide researchers with a consistent supply FAW samples.
Volunteer maize and sweetcorn plants hosting FAW larvae are being observed across New Zealand. These plants could act as a "green bridge" and support a FAW population through the cooler season into the next growing period in spring. Keep being observant. Please reach out with any FAW reports and speak with your local advisor if you need any assistance.
Plant & Food Research visiting researcher Dr. Jeremy Gonthier presenting at the recent 2025 FAW Research Workshop
Latest FAW Report
Current status: Fall armyworm (FAW) continues to be detected across New Zealand. However, except for some maize grain crops, the overall risk from FAW this season has likely passed. Adult moths are still being captured in pheromone traps, indicating continued presence in the environment. In the absence of preferred host plants such as maize and sweetcorn, it is important to remain vigilant by scouting volunteer plants, C4 grasses and other potential host crops.
Preferred crops: Now that preferred host plants such as maize and sweetcorn are largely absent from the landscape, adult FAW may seek alternative hosts. They are polyphagous, known to feed on over 350 plant species. However, they are most likely to favour other C4 grasses if available. Remain observant and please report any suspected FAW activity.
Crop monitoring: Scouting for and managing volunteer maize and sweetcorn is critical. Observations of FAW infestations on volunteer plants have already been reported from several regions around the country. These volunteers can serve as important green bridges for sustaining FAW populations through the off-season
Cultural controls: In regions where soil type and farm systems allow, paddock management practices such as light cultivation to approximately 10 cm depth, or the use of livestock to graze crop residues, can help destroy FAW and other noctuid pupae in the soil. This practice, sometimes referred to as “pupa busting,” may reduce local pest pressure in future seasons. Cultivation can also help manage volunteer host plants that may otherwise support pest populations in the off-season.
Natural controls: Large populations of Cotesia parasitoids have been observed across New Zealand and may play a significant role in reducing future FAW populations.
Communication: Collaboration and information sharing among growers, agronomists, and industry experts are essential to refining management strategies and improving outcomes
Regional Updates
Northland
-
Moth catches continue to be observed in large numbers in the Far North.
- FAW and Mythimna larvae have been observed in volunteer plants across Northland.
Auckland and Waikato
-
FAW larvae have been found in maize and sweetcorn volunteer plants in small numbers.
Bay of Plenty
-
FAW larvae have been observed recently in some maize volunteer plants by local agronomists. Please reach out to your advisor if you suspect FAW is present on your property.
Gisborne
- While FAW has been observed in the region since early 2025, there have been no recent observations. Please stay vigilant and reach out with any reports.
Westland
- Maize silage crops have been harvested in this region however there have been multiple adult moths caught recently in pheromone traps. This is not unexpected, and we will be supporting growers scouting winter grazing and cover crops.
Tasman
-
Moth flights have been observed recently in small numbers, while there is currently an absence of maize and sweetcorn growers are urged to be observant with C4 grasses having the potential to be winter hosts in this region.
Taranaki and Manawatu-Whanganui
- There have been no recent reports from this region
- Last autumn and winter, FAW was observed on residential lawns on multiple occasions in these regions.
Canterbury
- A single FAW adult moth was recently captured in a pheromone trap at an ex-sweetcorn paddock in North Canterbury.
- Maize crops in the area that are still standing are well advanced, and sweetcorn harvests have been completed. Cold temperatures and shorter days dramatically reduce the chances of survival in this region.
Hawke's Bay
- The most recent observation was of late instar larvae in volunteer sweetcorn in early April. Scouting C4 grasses and managing volunteer plants can be vital in preparations for the next growing season.
- Reach out to your local advisor for any support.
Is it Fall armyworm?
There are three key characteristics used in combination that will help identify FAW.
- First, a distinct ‘Y’ on the head leading into the dorsal line.
- Second, four trapezoid patterned dots on the body segments.
- Finally, four pronounced dots in a square pattern at the rear.
Other pests may share a similar identification but not all three key markings together.
Fall armyworm lifecycle and damage
Adult Moths

Male Fall armyworm moth
Source: Lyle Buss, University of Florida
Eggs

A typical FAW egg mass to the right and newly hatched neonates on the left

Eggs are small, <1 mm in diameter, and laid on leaf surfaces in a batch of 100–200 eggs covered with a felt of pale brown scales from the abdomen of the female moth.
Source: Plant & Food Research
First and Second Instars

1st instar larva causing "windowpane" damage.

Typical early instar damage can be easy to spot in multiple plants in close proximity.

Second instar larva showing characteristics of FAW, an eyeglass is a vital piece of equipment for correctly identifying pests.
Third Instar

Third instar larvae begin displaying typical FAW characteristics that can be identified quickly in the field, an eyeglass can still make this easier and more accurate if uncertain.

Multiple 3rd instar FAW larvae were found in just a couple of plants. At this stage, larvae are still prone in the folds of the leaves. This could be the last chance for effective chemical intervention if the economic thresholds are threatened.

Damage becomes much more noticeable on plants. The 3rd instar caterpillars begin spreading to adjacent plants, making it more noticeable when scouting. They will soon advance to the 4th instar and begin to target the whorl.
Fourth and fifth Instars

4th instar larvae of varying colour all showing the key characteristics of FAW. Each larvea was found in the whorl of 8 different adjacent plants.

Damage becomes more severe, often appearing almost overnight as larvae increase in appetite quickly.

Larvae burrow deeper into the whorl, often leaving a frass "plug" behind it.
Sixth Instar

Late instar larvae grow quickly and feed ferociously as they prepare for pupation.

Young plants can easily be eaten to ground level when late instar FAW are hungry!

Cobs suffer a reduction in yield and quality when FAW are feeding aggressively.
Pupation Stage

Most larvae burrow under the soil surface at the base of the plant it resided in.

Plants that have fresh frass and damage typical with late instar larva, but with no occupant, may have a pupa under the surface at its base.

Pupae are often dark reddish brown as they near emerging as an adult FAW moth.
Should I be monitoring my crop?
Crop monitoring is vital for managing pests in maize and sweetcorn effectively. Regular monitoring starts as soon as crops are planted. The most effective crop monitoring tool is crop scouting, which is defined as 'careful continuous observation', where a crop scout walks the whole crop to assess infestations and fresh damage. Crop scouting helps detect pest presence early, preventing significant damage during the vulnerable establishment stage of crops. It enables growers to assess pest populations, identify affected areas, and determine the most effective and timely control measures. Monitoring also supports integrated pest management (IPM) by providing insights into the activity of natural enemies, like Cotesia ruficrus. This ensures that interventions, such as selective insecticides, are used only when necessary, reducing costs and minimising environmental impact. It is also a great opportunity to assess crop status, nutrient requirements, other pests present, and disease and virus pressure, like Northern leaf blight.
How do I monitor my crop?
1. Identify the crop stage and plan the scouting choose a pattern (zig-zag or "W" shape) to cover all parts of the field.
2. Walk the field properly follow the planned path, and stop at regular points across the field.
3. Inspect the plants check several plants at each stop for FAW signs:
- Damage on leaves
- Frass (insect droppings)
- Larvae feeding in the whorl or on leaves
- Identify and record the presence of other pest species.
- Observe and record any beneficial species, especially Cotesia ruficrus.
4. Count and record
- Record the total number of plants checked.
- Record the number of plants with FAW damage or larvae.
- Record the size of FAW larvae.
- Record sightings of other pests or beneficial insects.
5. Calculate the percentage use the formula:
- (Number of damaged plants ÷ Total plants checked) × 100
- Example: (8÷50) ×100=16%
6. Compare to the threshold use the threshold table to decide if action is needed
7. Repeat scout crops as often as possible, ideally once a week at a minimum, following a different path each time.
Note: The more sample sites you check across a paddock, the more accurate your results will be. This helps you make better decisions by comparing your observations to the economic thresholds more reliably.
When plants are small and it is easy to move through the crop, we recommend a "W" shape scouting pattern.
When plants reach the later whorl stage, it can become harder to move through the crop. We recommend a zig-zag-shaped scouting pattern, allowing quicker and more effective coverage of the field.
Monitoring for adult FAW moths
Monitoring pheromone traps
Pheromone Traps as Indicators
- Purpose: Pheromone traps are used to monitor the presence of adult males and provide an early warning of FAW activity in an area. Moth catches in traps indicate the potential for egg-laying and a new generation of larvae in the crop.
- Trap Setup: Traps are typically deployed at or slightly above the crop canopy and baited with synthetic female sex pheromones that attract male moths. Regular monitoring (daily or weekly) is required to assess trends in moth activity.
- Note - Some moth species may have similar chemical compounds in their pheromones, causing them to be attracted to FAW lures. By-catch observed in NZ includes Agrotis ipsilon, Ichneutica semivittata, and Ichneutica mutans

A traditional Noctuid bucket trap with a FAW-specific pheromone

FAW moths are being remotely monitored and identified using a CropVue delta trap.

A CropVue Delta trap deployed in a sweetcorn crop uses a FAW pheromone to attract and capture male adult moths on a sticky base. The solar-powered unit transmits a daily photo and uses an AI algorithm to identify male FAW adults.
Why does the size of the caterpillar matter?
Identifying the size of Fall Armyworm (FAW) larvae is important for effective targeted chemical intervention because smaller larvae are more vulnerable to insecticides. Early detection of young larvae, typically less than 10 mm in length, allows for more effective control before they burrow into the whorl or cob. As larvae grow larger, they become harder to kill, cause more damage, and may require higher chemical inputs, which increases cost and environmental impact. Accurate assessment of larval size ensures timely and efficient application of control measures.

Source: Corteva Agriscience
Economic Thresholds
Economic thresholds are very important in an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy because they help make smart decisions about pest control. An economic threshold is the level of pest numbers or damage at which action must be taken to prevent the pest from causing too much damage and reducing the crop yield in a way that would cost more money than the cost of controlling the pest.

This is the current New Zealand economic thresholds guide developed by AgResearch
What are other similar pests in maize?
Helicoverpa armigera (Corn earworm)

Helicoverpa armigera is a significant maize and sweetcorn pest in New Zealand.

The Corn earworm at the top shows a hairy and diamond-like pattern, it looks spikey in comparison to the FAW larvae below, which also clearly shows 4 pronounced dots in a square shape at its rear.

Helicoverpa armigera can vary in colour, appearing green, yellow, black, and even pink. Regardless of the colour, the key to identifying this caterpillar is how hairy and spikey its appearance.
Mythimna separata (Cosmopolitan armyworm)

Mythimna separata is a maize and sweetcorn pest common around New Zealand.

Mythimna separata are foliar feeders, although they will occasionally feed on the silks and tops of cobs. If populations are large, they are capable of completely defoliating crops.

The parasitic wasp, Cotesia ruficrus, effectively controls Mythimna separata. Both of these caterpillars are the victims of this industrious little wasp.
Spodoptera litura (Tropical armyworm)

Tropical armyworm is often confused with FAW, it is not normally a maize or sweetcorn pest unless populations are large, normally feeding in the undergrowth, in pasture or in leafy vegetable crops.
Agrotis ipsilon (Greasy cutworm)

Agrotis ipsilon is found across New Zealand. They are a pest that can cause significant damage to large areas of many newly germinated and established crops.

Larvae live under the soil surface feeding on the radicles and shoots of newly germinated seed. They will cut through the stems of newly emerged and established crops giving them their "cutworm" name.
What are beneficials?
Let the good guys do the work!
A wide range of beneficial predators and parasitoids contributes to the natural control of Fall Armyworm (FAW) in arable cropping systems, including maize and sweetcorn. These natural enemies can be categorised into resident and transient species. Resident species live within the crop environment year-round, playing a crucial role in controlling pests during crop establishment when the plants are most vulnerable. Transient species, on the other hand, move into the crop only when a pest population is present and serve as an important part of pest suppression.
Predators
Predators, such as spiders, are among the most effective natural enemies of FAW. Spiders can be abundant in maize and sweetcorn systems, preying on a variety of FAW life stages, including eggs and larvae. These predators are relatively easy to spot due to their larger size and active hunting behaviour. Their impact is immediate as they capture and consume their prey directly and may contribute to a significant reduction in FAW populations.
Parasitoids
Parasitoids, such as the wasp Cotesia ruficrus, are less visible but very important in controlling FAW. Cotesia ruficrus lays its eggs inside FAW larvae, and the developing wasp larvae consume the host from within, eventually killing it. This activity often goes unnoticed until the later larvae or pupal stage when the parasitoid creates a bunch of cocoons within or near the remains of the host. These parasitoids can also be monitored by examining host larvae for signs of parasitism or identifying cocoons in the crop.
Integration with Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
IPM strategies aim to maximise the populations of resident beneficial species, such as spiders, while encouraging the activity of transient species like Cotesia ruficrus. With the reduction or withdrawal of broad-spectrum insecticides, it may take time for resident populations to recover and establish, but transient species can readily colonise a crop when FAW is present. Encouraging biodiversity, maintaining habitats, and using selective insecticides can help optimise the roles of these natural enemies in FAW management.
Plant & Food Research has identified Cotesia ruficrus and spiders as key natural enemies of FAW in New Zealand maize and sweetcorn crops. However, many other predators and parasitoids also contribute to the natural suppression of FAW populations, forming a diverse and dynamic system of biological control. This natural management method is a critical component of sustainable FAW control and reduces reliance on chemical insecticides.
Natural predators of FAW
Cotesia ruficrus
To date, this parasitic wasp has been identified by far as the MOST IMPORTANT BENEFICIAL we have for FAW in maize and sweetcorn in NZ.

Cotesia larvae found inside a recently deceased FAW.
Source: Daniel Hawkins, Northland Seed & Supplies Ltd

Cotesia ruficrus grow and feed inside the host, killing it, then emerging and form white cotton bud like cocoons that are often spotted in maize and sweetcorn crops.

Cotesia ruficrus adult
Source: Plant & Food Research
Maize and sweetcorn beneficials

Lissopimpla excelsa, commonly known as the Dusky-winged Ichneumonid, is a solitary parasitoid native to Australia that targets various Lepidoptera pests, including caterpillar species found in maize and sweetcorn crops.

Arachnid species like spiders and harvestmen (pictured above) in maize and sweetcorn crops act as generalist predators, preying on a wide range of insects, including pest species. They help regulate populations of caterpillars, aphids, and other soft-bodied pests by ambushing or actively hunting them.

Ladybirds (Coccinellidae spp) are well-known predators in New Zealand cropping systems, playing a crucial role in managing various pest species. While primarily recognised for feeding on aphids and other small insects, some ladybird species prey on Lepidoptera eggs and small larvae.

Meteorus pulchricornis,or the Basket-cocoon parasitoid, is a self-introduced generalist parasitic wasp that has been found attacking Lepidoptera pests in New Zealand maize and sweetcorn crops. These parasitoids target a range of caterpillar species, including Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).

The Tasmanian lacewing (Micromus tasmaniae) is a generalist predator found in New Zealand, known for preying on soft-bodied insects such as aphids, thrips, and small pests. While its primary prey are aphids, it has the potential to consume small caterpillars, including those of pest species like FAW.
Fall armyworm resistance management
Insecticide resistance poses a major challenge for the control of Fall Armyworm (FAW) worldwide. In Brazil, widespread resistance has led to the near-total failure of chemical options, creating significant management difficulties. In New Zealand, managing FAW effectively requires not only addressing current infestations but also mitigating the risk of resistance development, which could impact the management of other pests like Helicoverpa armigera (Thebeatsheet)
At present, Sparta™ (spinetoram) is currently the only insecticide registered for FAW control in New Zealand. Evidence from Australia, where FAW populations have been closely studied, indicates that resistance to certain insecticidal Mode of Action (MoA) groups is already established. Since the initial populations in New Zealand are likely to have originated from Australia via wind dispersal, it is reasonable to assume that similar resistance traits are present here. Australian research in 2020–21 revealed moderate resistance to carbamates and organophosphates and high resistance to synthetic pyrethroids (Bird et al., 2022).
Given this context, monitoring resistance in New Zealand populations and adopting proactive resistance management strategies will be crucial. These measures will help ensure Sparta remains effective and prevent resistance from becoming a critical barrier to FAW control in the future.
The most recognised and sustainable insecticide resistance management strategy is the rotation of different mode of action (MoA) groups over time. For more details see: Insecticide Resistance Action Committee | IRAC
Use Targeted Applications:
- Apply insecticides only when pest populations reach economic thresholds to minimise unnecessary use.
- Focus on early instars of FAW, as they are more susceptible than later stages and exposed on leaves.
Integrate Non-Chemical Controls:
- Incorporate biological controls, such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) products, and cultural practices, such as crop rotation and resistant crop varieties.
- Preserve and support natural predators of FAW by minimising the use of broad-spectrum insecticides.
Ensure Proper Application Practices:
- Calibrate spray equipment correctly to achieve uniform coverage and effective control.
- Avoid sub-lethal doses by following recommended application rates and timings as per product labels.
Monitor and Adapt Strategies:
- Regularly monitor FAW populations for signs of resistance development.
- Work with researchers and industry to adapt strategies based on resistance monitoring data.
Future Options:
- A diamide insecticide is currently under review by the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for use on FAW in maize and sweetcorn. If approved, this product will provide an additional and much needed different MoA group to improve resistance management and support sustainable pest control efforts.
Insecticide options
When managing Fall Armyworm (FAW) in maize and sweetcorn, it is crucial to consider the impact of foliar insecticides on beneficial insects. Preserving these beneficial species can support long-term pest management by maintaining natural predator populations that help suppress FAW infestations. Selective insecticides are generally less harmful to beneficial species compared to broad-spectrum chemicals. It is important to carefully read product labels and consult other resources before spraying to ensure informed decision-making.
Not all broad-spectrum chemicals directly kill beneficial species, but secondary poisoning is a concern. Beneficial insects, such as predators or parasitoids, may be harmed if they consume FAW larvae or other pests that have ingested or come into contact with insecticides. This underscores the importance of integrating selective insecticides with other pest management strategies, such as monitoring pest populations and supporting natural enemies.
For effective FAW management, consider the role of parasitic wasps and other beneficial insects in controlling early instar larvae. Protecting these species can help delay the resurgence of FAW to problematic levels after an insecticide application, contributing to a more sustainable and effective pest management program in maize and sweetcorn.
On label and recommended for FAW and other noctuid species in maize and sweetcorn
120 g/L Jemvelva® active (Spinetoram)
Sparta™
Mode of Action: Jemvelva® active is active on all larval life stages and enters the insect primarily through the digestive system (ingestion activity) and secondarily through the insect exoskeleton (contact activity).
IRAC Group: 5
Beneficial Impact: Anecdotal evidence suggests this active ingredient is suspected to be harmful to small parasitic wasps
Spray InformationEffective, beneficial friendly option on a range of lepidopteran species in maize and sweetcorn
Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki
DiPel DF
Mode of Action: Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes
IRAC Group: 11
Beneficial Impact: Low Lepidopteran-specific microbial toxin that must be ingested.
Spray InformationUse as a LAST RESORT only
Chlorpyriphos
Multiple generics
Mode of Action: Organophosphate. Has contact and vapour action and also acts as a stomach poison when ingested. Acts directly on the nervous system of susceptible pests.
IRAC Group: 1B
Beneficial Impact: High impact on all insects, very harmful to beneficials.
Spray InformationDO NOT USE any Group 3 products to control FAW
FAW in NZ is likely resistant to all Synthetic pyrethroids
lambda-cyhalothrin
KARATE ZEON, CYHELLA, HALEX CS, LAVRON, TAEKWANDO 250 CS
Mode of Action: Synthetic pyrethroid. Primarily a contact and stomach poison with direct effects on the nervous system of susceptible insect pests.
IRAC Group: 3A
Beneficial Impact: Highly toxic to ALL beneficial insects
Spray InformationAdditional Resources
The Beatsheet - find out what is happening in Queensland, Australia.
Insecticide Resistance Action Committee | IRAC